Author Archives: Steve Tilford

6 month Ban for “Motorized Doping” – UCI

This entry was posted in Comments about Cycling on by .

Me and the UCI don’t see eye to eye much when it comes to penalties levied for cheating in bike races.  Like really cheating, not just crossing the yellow line type cheating.

I guess they decided that there must be some factual evidence that some professionals have been using electric motors during competition.  I say that because there would be no reason to address a issue, unless there was an issue.

So, the UCI made some rules if, or when, they catch some guy riding around, or attempting to ride around, on a bike with a motor in it.  Here is a link to an article at Cyclingnews.

What that article says is that the UCI thinks it is being very strict that mandating that a rider caught would face a minimum suspension of, yes, 6 months, for using a motor in a professional race.  Plus, fines, of course.  But the team would also face that same time-out, plus fines of 100000 to a million Swiss Francs.

UCI’s president Brian Cookson said, “The UCI takes the issue of technological doping, such as the ability to use hidden motors, very seriously.”

Come on, seriously?  If you catch a rider trying to race a race with a motor in his bike, then he has to serve a 6 month time-out?  Fuck that.  The guy is obviously really, really cheating, the same as a guy that injects EPO and HGH.  But the difference here is that you have an electric motor as absolute positive proof that he was doing it.  Not all this, I ate my grandma’s dairy cow, sat on Tenerife for month, explanations for why there are problems in their blood.

And personally, I don’t ever want to see a guy that would attempt to use a motor on his bike to ever be seen again.  Use an electric motor, then you should be suspended for life.

The article says that in Italy, there have been 1200 electric motors, I assume small enough to be contained within the tubing of a bike, sold recently. It says that the motor can be synced with a heart-rate monitor and it kicks in when the heart-rate hits a pre-set threshold.  Also, some can be bluetooth and be operated remotely.

Who comes up with this stuff?  Lets make a small electric motor that can be operated remotely?  If this technology is in existence, then it has to be for the competition side of our sport.  Or maybe they made it for  a kind of twisted practical joke to play on someone?  Seems a little expensive for that.

Anyway, back to the UCI.  This new sanction rule for electric motors just goes to show what page the UCI is on when it comes to tolerating real cheating.  They call it electronic doping.  It probably isn’t as advantageous as the real doping, but no doubt it helps.  If someone goes to this extent to cheat, then they are gone.  BIke racing is not a right, it is a privilege.

Come on, UCI.  Let’s just make the rules so that riders “are forced” into just using their own power to make their bikes go forward.  None of this, if you do this, then you’ll be slapped this hard shit.  Bike racing is a very complicated sport, but the real basis of it is that a rider has to power the bike.

My stance, if I were czar of the sport, would be that the team that was caught electronically doping their riders, would instantly be disbanded, never to be seen again.  The team directors and all support of the teams would never be allowed to work in the sport again.  And the rider or riders using the motors, would never be issued a license again, suspended forever, plus would all have to go to Levi’s Grand Fondo, each and every year, until they die.  On their own dime.

But that is just me.

 

gruber-assist-motor

 

 

The first half of the video is showing how to insert the electric motor and for 3:30 on, it shows the Cancellara deal at Pari-Roubaix and Flanders from a while ago.

Police Throwing Rocks Back

This entry was posted in Important Society Issues on by .

Okay, these riots in Baltimore the last few days have been pretty crazy.  It really isn’t about the death of Freddy Gray.  That might have been the catalyst to start them, but this has been building for a while, everywhere.

Obviously, a bunch of people aren’t too happy with the Baltimore police after Freddy Gray ended up dead, with a broken back, after entering a police transport vehicle.  But these riots could be going on many places here in the US.  The anger is from the injustice pertaining to socioeconomic status and other huge issues relating to race.

The video footage of all riots are disturbing.  Everything about a riot is screwed up.  No one wins in a riot.  You can’t win a riot.  Everyone and everything loses.  Maybe the looters of CVS, who got a big arm full of diapers sort of won something, but in reality, in riots, everyone loses.

So, lets just take the cause and reasons out of this discussion.  And try to remove race too. This could be a riot after the World Series, or NCAA Basketball Finals, a rock concert, or for any number of reasons, in many different places.  Let’s try to look at this as any random riot and the police were trying to control the outcome.

This riot happened to be in Baltimore.  There are a bunch of videos out there that show police actually throwing rocks back at the protesters.  How stupid is that?  Police have to realize that nearly everything that they do, nowadays, is going to be captured on video.  They can’t do something as stupid as picking up rocks and hurling them back at the guys throwing them.

Here’s the deal.  Throwing rocks and bricks at police is really, really bad.  Someone could get killed.  But the police are there to try to establish order.  To stop the rock and brick throwing. Hopefully, by their presence, but if necessary, by arresting the guys doing it.

But there is never a case that it is okay for the police to actually participate in the rock throwing. They shouldn’t, and can’t get caught up in the escalation of the situation. This wasn’t a joust.  Or tit for tat.  It was a riot.   By them throwing rocks back, they are participating in that riot, not policing it.

Nothing guarantees that a rock that the cop throws is anywhere near accurate.  What if there is an innocent homeowner, standing in their yard, trying to protect their property and a rock, that left a police officers hand, wacks them on the head.  Who do they call?

The police are there to arrest people that are throwing rocks.  There isn’t another level of protection that can go up to the police officer and arrest them for escalating a riot by throwing rocks.

Like I said above, everyone loses in riots.  Property is destroyed, people are hurt and nothing gets figured out.  At least the police didn’t pull their guns out and start shooting.   But, I might understand that more than them picking up rocks and hurling them back.

Being a police officer is a job, a volunteer occupation.  The police can’t lower their, thus our, standards and fight back.  That isn’t their job.  They can’t let their emotions rage out of control and take the law into their own hands.  Their job is to defuse the situation.  By throwing rocks, they were escalating it.

 

A police officer throws an object at protestors.  (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

A police officer throws an object at protestors. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

Or a little May Day action in Seattle today?  This is on Capitol Hill.  Not the ghettos of Baltimore.  The one bike cop makes a pretty nice on the fly tackle off his bike.  Wonder what that guy did to piss them off?