Yesterday, Cyclingnews wrote a article about one of the Polish brothers, that I posted about a couple days ago, tried to commit suicide. I felt pretty shitty. I was thinking, “is there even a remote chance he saw my posting and that affected his decision?” Almost impossible, but that was my first thought. The article went on to imply that it is understandable why they took EPO. Mainly citing that their father only makes 250 Euros a month and that they were going to make 10 X that amount with their new contracts.

That is what is so stupid about the whole doping thing. Justifying the actions. I feel bad that the guy was so shamed, embarrassed, depressed, whatever, that he thought it best to kill himself. But obviously, he only felt that way after he was caught for EPO. I received a comment about how the riders are always taking the blame for all the drug positives and that other factors come into play. These guys didn’t even have enough funds to afford a systematic drug program most likely. But, ultimately the riders are responsible for the end result. It’s their lives. Maybe you should think that if you’re doing something that is going to make you want to kill yourself if you get “caught” later, you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place. But, maybe you don’t know how you’ll feel until the situation arises. I don’t know. Anyway, he obviously knew he was doing something that was not right in the first place or he wouldn’t of reacted like he did. Enough said.

But, Valverde is much different. I’m torn with Valverde. Puerto almost seems old news. And I love the way the guy rides. I think that most modern day cyclists don’t have the complete package. Valverde does. I like that he sprints at the end of stages during Grand Tours. Climbs well and TT’s reasonably. But, I don’t think that he should of been racing bikes the last couple years. He should of done his “timeout” like Basso did and say he is sorry. I’m not sure what I think about the way the Italians got his blood from Puerto and matched it with his blood from the Tour. But, his blood is his blood. And the blood in the bag had EPO in it, so he wasn’t keepin’ it around just in case he was in an auto accident. So, he needs a timeout and sit in the corner for awhile.

I very much doubt that Alejandro Valverde is going to be so remorseful that he will try to commit suicide because of all these accusations. But, like I said, you never know how you react until you’re in the siutuation. Let’s hope not. He’ll most likely get an international ban from the UCI, train for a couple years and come back like Basso and be stronger than ever.

The biggest loser here might be Contador. He’s not going to have Alejandro and his Caisse d’Epargne Team around to set tempo for him in all the big races when Astana isn’t strong enough to do so.

Or Contador pulling around the Caisse d'Epargne Team.

I’ve noticed that the officiating is done more and more by officials that have never raced bicycles. “In the old days”, most of the officials were bike racers themselves or had raced bicycles. Or, better yet, we had Event Services, where Brian Drebber and Gypsy (Fred Patton) pretty much ran the whole show. Now it seems there are professional officials, people who don’t even ride bicycles let alone race them. People making money on the weekends by officiating. With that said, you’d think officiating would become more professional then, too. But, it hasn’t. It kind of amazes me that at many NRC races, there are many officials at the event that make more money than the PRO rider that wins the race. That seems just wrong.

Anyway, I’m kind of tired of officials trying to enforce rules that don’t matter. A case in point is a situation that occurred last weekend in Arkansas. I had the unfortunate luck to be parked right next to the pre-race officials meeting. I overheard one of the officials talking about crinkled numbers to the promoter. Then, the other officials started talking about how to apply the $25 fine to the riders, etc. It was a big deal. They were trying to figure out the best way to police all the separate fields. The promoter told them that was between them and USAC.

I could not help myself and just had to interrupt and ask them exactly what it was they were talking about. I told them I had already crinkled my number and that I’d done it thousands of times. I couldn’t believe there was actually a rule against a crinkled number.

One official pulled out his rulebook and showed me the following rule, which he had already underlined and highlighted sometime earlier-

1N7. Racing numbers.

(b) Riders shall place their numbers as prescribed by the officials and in such a way that they are visible when the rider is in a racing position. When shoulder numbers are provided for cyclocross, they are worn on the upper arm to be visible from the front. Hip numbers shall be attached securely at least at the four corners with pins and no accessory or hair may obstruct a clear view of the number (riders with misplaced, obscured or unreadable numbers will not be placed). If shoulder or frame numbers are provided, they too shall be placed as prescribed. Numbers may not be folded, trimmed, crumpled, or otherwise defaced. [Replacement of the numbers at riders’ expense if noted before the start, otherwise warning or relegation.]

I’ve been crinkling numbers for decades. Actually, I might have been the first rider ever to ever crinkle a number. I guess I should use the USAC’s vernacular – I might have been the first rider ever to crumple a number. Crumpled numbers sit much flatter on your jersey, are easier to pin and don’t catch wind and flap. I have only heard one explanation why not to crumple a number. Something about the idea that light refracts off the number, especially at night, and the number is not readable on the camera.

If that is what they are using for an explanation, it is just wrong. Maybe, in theory, I’ve raced more bicycle races than just about anyone around. At least, more bicycle races using the current/modern tyvek numbers. And almost for sure, I’ve raced more night time criteriums than just about anyone else alive. And, I can’t recall one time that my crumpled number had anything to do with me not being scored. It is just not an issue.

I hate subjective rules. I looked at Catherine’s number just after she had pinned it on. Then she went to the bathroom, peeled down her skinsuit and put it back on. The number was pretty crumpled. Crumpled enough that an official could call her on it.

Number pinning is a pain in the ass. Especially doing it yourself. Think of the normal Cat. 5 guy that pins his number. He pins his number on, most likely upside down, and then his kid crawls all over his jersey. Or, he is so nervous, he sticks the jersey back into his bag and gets a different jersey out and then remembers his number is pinned on the first jersey. By then, the number is illegal. It is nearly impossible not to have a crumpled number.

So, these officials are trying to enforce a rule that doesn’t have anything to do with what is actually going on in cycling. I don’t know how many riders went back into registration and got new numbers once the rumor got going that the officials were planning on fining riders $25 on the line. A lot. And they were making riders change their numbers on the line if they were crumpled.

We, as bike racers, don’t need the added nervousness/hassle before the start of a race. We create enough of that on our own. The sport is supposed to be fun for the weekend warriors. I can understand certain rules applying to the PRO-1 race only. But, this isn’t one of them.

The best official at a bike race is one that you don’t ever know was present. A race went perfectly if there was no interaction between the riders and the officials. Let’s try to make that a more commonplace occurrence.

Illegal.